We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
I've been traveling a bit lately and on one of the trips I talked with the owner of a business about some problems he was having between management and staff. Here's a general idea of the conversation.
The story goes that two like educated and responsible people work together in a place of business.
Both are expected to be at work 40 hours per week, record that they started work at 8 a.m. and left work at 5 p.m. and not a minute late or early. They also must take two 15-minute breaks and a half hour lunch, and be able to prove it. Each is paid $15.00 per hour.
So person A—call her Sally—gets the assigned work done in a 24-hour time period and then sits reading the newspaper and surfing the Internet for the other 16 hours in pursuit of knowledge and how she might improve herself and what she does at the office.
Person B—call him Jeff—could get the work done in 24 hours but stretches the work to a 40-hour period to look good to management and to ensure the company does not put additional work on his plate.
Sally is fired for slacking on the job and doing personal work during company time.
I ask: "Who would you rather have working on your team—Sally or Jeff? Who should really have been let go?" He smiled and asked what I would do.
Traditional ways of thinking just don't work today
I've always looked at a work week from the perspective of quality of life for the employee, the company, and the customer. Clearly, quality of life is directly related to productivity—for how can one really be productive without some quality to their lives?
What relationship does working some number of hours have with productivity or genuine results? What does making a parent work when their children may have an important school event have to do with their performance?
My company has never forced fixed hours on someone and never will.
I believe in enabling and empowering, and in my humble opinion those efforts do not arrive from a “you must work 40 hours per week” mantra.
Of course, this is not perfect for all businesses. However, if everyone out there could enjoy 70% of something good rather than 100% of something not so good, well…I can't imagine that could be a bad thing.
Times are different. The business world and the way we work will never be the same. It's time that we make the changes to improve life.
I know this can work as I've done it and I've helped others do the same. It's just good business. By the way…the owner of that business called me a couple weeks later and asked if I knew anyone who was looking for a job to manage a couple of talented people.
Find the Warehousing Tip and Rule #2 at www.beltechgroupinc.com/insights.html.
Dan Belanger is the President of the Belanger Technology and Consulting Group. His background includes 30 years of solution-based action in multiple business models including distribution, manufacturing, warehousing, facilities management, service, retail, and information systems. He is well-versed in all aspects of business ownership, operations, and management. With time spent at the Executive Management level, Field Implementations, and having worked closely with business owners, executives, and staff, he understands the complexities and expectations related to running a profitable business. Dan understands the human element, which makes managing comfortable and successful change one of his core competencies. Contact Dan at: 702-785-7331 or dan@danbtg.com. Visit him on the web at: www.beltechgroupinc.com. You may also reach Dan at: www.linkedin.com/in/belangerdan/